![]() To do this, we can pass parameters to the rendering method. Parameters and Runtime Customization As we have connected our report to our datasource, let's render some data The important thing now is how to retrieve our end-user data. The standalone client of Findbugs can be used to analyze Java byte code in the case the source code is not available, e.g., to get an impression about the quality of 3 rd party libraries. We can find the complete comparison list in this matrix 3.3. The dashboard of Sonar summaries the results in one report, enables to manage a central rule set and an excellent Eclipse Plug-in for local analysis is available. My recommended way to use the three tools is Codehaus Sonar. Using configurable methods, Java Comparator can compare objects to return an integer based on a positive, equal or negative comparison. ![]() Be careful with the Checkstyle rules - just activate what is really necessary and accepted by the team. Almost all warnings of Findbugs are without any doubt possible defects or things which are harmful in some way.Īfter the developers are used to work with static code analysis you should start with some PMD rules and later with the more style questions from Checkstyle. You will not have a lot discussions about the warnings with the developers. ![]() In the beginning (first weeks) the best is to start with Findbugs. As you may see in the direct comparison - the three tools have some aspects and/or rules in common, but they give just in the combination 100% functionality you may need in your project.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |